RAMAN vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/13085/2026
Disposed: --ALLOWED on 21st April 2026.
CNR: PHHC010403712026
Filing Number
CRM-M/16725/2026
Filing Date
09-Mar-2026
Registration No
CRM-M/13085/2026
Registration Date
09-Mar-2026
Judge
Ms. Justice Rupinderjit Chahal
Coram
Ms. Justice Rupinderjit Chahal
Bench Type
Single
Category
40.2 - REGULAR BAIL (HARYANA) ( 219 )
Sub-Category
( 944 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL BRANCH
Decision Date
21-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
--ALLOWED
Last updated 28-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAMAN
Adv. S.S. NAIN
-
2.STATE OF HARYANA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF HARYANA
-
2.STATE OF HARYANA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
21-Apr-2026
Ms. Justice Rupinderjit ChahalView PDF
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to Raman in a murder case (FIR No. 236), finding that he had been in custody for over 16 months with investigation complete and only 7 of 31 witnesses examined, making continued detention violative of Article 21 rights. The court emphasized that speedy trial is fundamental and prolonged detention without trial prospect constitutes infringement of life and liberty, applying the principle that "bail is a rule" and "jail is an exception." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRM-M/13085/2026
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to Raman in a murder case (FIR No. 236), finding that he had been in custody for over 16 months with investigation complete and only 7 of 31 witnesses examined, making continued detention violative of Article 21 rights. The court emphasized that speedy trial is fundamental and prolonged detention without trial prospect constitutes infringement of life and liberty, applying the principle that "bail is a rule" and "jail is an exception." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts