PARAKSH CHAND vs KARTAR SINGH — RSA/3069/1997

Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010402451997

Filing Number

RSA/3069/1997

Filing Date

01-Oct-1997

Registration No

RSA/3069/1997

Registration Date

01-Oct-1997

Judge

Mr. Justice Virinder Aggarwal

Coram

Mr. Justice Virinder Aggarwal

Bench Type

Single

Category

26 - RSA ( 496 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL II(RSA) BRANCH

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PARAKSH CHAND

    Adv. SANJAY MAJITHIA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KARTAR SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Virinder AggarwalView PDF

    Case Summary: RSA/3069/1997 Court Decision: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the appellants' second appeal, upholding the concurrent findings of the lower courts that rejected their claim to disputed land. Key Reasoning: The court found that: (1) the suit was not properly instituted by an authorized attorney, as the power of attorney granted to Kehar Singh did not clearly authorize challenging the disputed 1987 sale deeds; (2) the appellants failed to conclusively prove that the original landowners had died before executing the sale deeds, with a legal presumption favoring continuance of life; and (3) significant gaps in evidence, including failure to produce key witnesses and properly connect death certificates to specific individuals, weakened their case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Oct-1997

    Case filed

    Registration No. RSA/3069/1997

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RSA/3069/1997 Court Decision: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the appellants' second appeal, upholding the concurrent findings of the lower courts that rejected their claim to disputed land. Key Reasoning: The court found that: (1) the suit was not properly instituted by an authorized attorney, as the power of attorney granted to Kehar Singh did not clearly authorize challenging the disputed 1987 sale deeds; (2) the appellants failed to conclusively prove that the original landowners had died before executing the sale deeds, with a legal presumption favoring continuance of life; and (3) significant gaps in evidence, including failure to produce key witnesses and properly connect death certificates to specific individuals, weakened their case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case