JASVIR KAUR vs ANMOL RATTAN — TA/356/2026

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 11-Mar-2026

CNR: PHHC010400112026

e-Filing Number

06-03-2026

Filing Number

TA/13565/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

TA/356/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Judge

Ms. Justice Nidhi Gupta

Coram

Ms. Justice Nidhi Gupta

Bench Type

Single

Category

35 - TRANSFERS ( 565 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JASVIR KAUR

    Adv. MOHD. YOUSAF

  2. 2.ANMOL RATTAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ANMOL RATTAN

  2. 2.ANMOL RATTAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    Ms. Justice Nidhi GuptaView PDF

    Case Summary: TA/356/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted Jasvir Kaur's transfer application, relocating her husband Anmol Rattan's Hindu Marriage Act Section 13 divorce petition from Ludhiana Family Court to Malerkotla Court. Justice Nidhi Gupta prioritized the wife's convenience, considering her unemployment, financial dependence, 50km distance to Ludhiana, lack of male family support for travel, and custody of their infant child. The court imposed conditions on the husband: clearing maintenance arrears, paying Rs.1,000 daily for her court attendance, and depositing Rs.25,000 for litigation expenses if contesting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. TA/356/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: TA/356/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted Jasvir Kaur's transfer application, relocating her husband Anmol Rattan's Hindu Marriage Act Section 13 divorce petition from Ludhiana Family Court to Malerkotla Court. Justice Nidhi Gupta prioritized the wife's convenience, considering her unemployment, financial dependence, 50km distance to Ludhiana, lack of male family support for travel, and custody of their infant child. The court imposed conditions on the husband: clearing maintenance arrears, paying Rs.1,000 daily for her court attendance, and depositing Rs.25,000 for litigation expenses if contesting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case