SMT SAHAB KAUR AND OTHERS vs THE STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — CWP/7095/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section ARTICLE 226. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 10-Mar-2026

CNR: PHHC010397692026

e-Filing Number

06-03-2026

Filing Number

CWP/13437/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

CWP/7095/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Harsh Bunger

Coram

Mr. Justice Harsh Bunger

Bench Type

Single

Category

18.11 - LAND LAWS S.B. ( 448 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section ARTICLE 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT SAHAB KAUR AND OTHERS

    Adv. SAURABH DALAL

  2. 2.THE STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

  3. 3.COMMISSIONER

  4. 4.ASSISTANT COLLECTOR 1ST GRADE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.THE STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

  3. 3.COMMISSIONER

  4. 4.ASSISTANT COLLECTOR 1ST GRADE

  5. 5.SMT SHEELA

  6. 6.VIJAY

  7. 7.SMT KAMLA

  8. 8.RANBIR

  9. 9.MAINPAL

  10. 10.SANJAY

  11. 11.PAWAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Harsh BungerView PDF

    Case Summary: The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn but issued a directive to the Assistant Collector to expeditiously conclude partition proceedings pending since 2018, preferably within six months. The petitioner withdrew the challenge to the Commissioner's remand order but sought time-bound directions given the eight-year pendency, which the court granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/7095/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn but issued a directive to the Assistant Collector to expeditiously conclude partition proceedings pending since 2018, preferably within six months. The petitioner withdrew the challenge to the Commissioner's remand order but sought time-bound directions given the eight-year pendency, which the court granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case