JOGINDER SINGH AND ORS vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER — CRM-M/14328/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010397382026

Filing Number

CRM-M/16493/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/14328/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Judge

Ms. Justice Mandeep Pannu

Coram

Ms. Justice Mandeep Pannu

Bench Type

Single

Category

38.21 - QUASHING PETITION COMPROMISE U/S 482 CRPC GEN ( 641 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 12-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JOGINDER SINGH AND ORS

    Adv. LUPIL GUPTA

  2. 2.JOGINDER SINGH

  3. 3.JASPAL KAUR

  4. 4.SUKHMANDER SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.JOGINDER SINGH

  3. 3.JASPAL KAUR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Ms. Justice Mandeep PannuView PDF

    Summary The High Court of Punjab and Haryana quashed FIR No. 121 (dated 09.10.2023) under Sections 452, 323, 109, and 34 IPC registered at Police Station Phul, District Bathinda, after confirming that the parties reached a genuine, voluntary compromise without coercion. The court held that under Section 528 of BNSS (inherent powers), it may quash proceedings even in non-compoundable offences when an amicable settlement is reached, as continuing would serve no purpose and waste judicial time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/14328/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Punjab and Haryana quashed FIR No. 121 (dated 09.10.2023) under Sections 452, 323, 109, and 34 IPC registered at Police Station Phul, District Bathinda, after confirming that the parties reached a genuine, voluntary compromise without coercion. The court held that under Section 528 of BNSS (inherent powers), it may quash proceedings even in non-compoundable offences when an amicable settlement is reached, as continuing would serve no purpose and waste judicial time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case