JAGIR SINGH ETC. JATIN SALWAN, R K ARYA, DEEPAK VERMA vs DAVINDER SINGH ETC. — RSA/2626/1996

Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 01-Jul-2009

CNR: PHHC010397281996

Filing Number

RSA/2626/1996

Filing Date

06-Nov-2008

Registration No

RSA/2626/1996

Registration Date

06-Nov-2008

Judge

Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta

Coram

Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta

Bench Type

Single

Category

26 - RSA ( 496 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL II(RSA) BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAGIR SINGH ETC. JATIN SALWAN, R K ARYA, DEEPAK VERMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DAVINDER SINGH ETC.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Deepak GuptaView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the second appeal by Jagir Singh and others, upholding the First Appellate Court's reversal of the trial court's judgment. The court held that the plaintiffs failed to establish that the disputed property was ancestral coparcenary property under Hindu law, as they produced no revenue pedigree or cogent evidence proving descent through successive generations. Additionally, the alleged family settlement lacked documentary or reliable oral testimony, and revenue entries showing the plaintiffs' possession only reflected their status as sons of the defendant (a co-sharer) rather than conferring independent ownership rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Jul-2018

    Mr. Justice Jitendra Chauhan

  4. 07-May-2018

    Mr. Justice Harinder Singh Sidhu

  5. 08-Jan-2018

    Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj

  6. 11-Jul-2017

    Mr. Justice Darshan Singh

  7. 09-Jan-2017

    Mr. Justice Harminder Singh Madaan

  8. 04-Jul-2016

    Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj

  9. 05-Jan-2016

    Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj

  10. 10-Aug-2015

    Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj

  11. 02-Mar-2015

    Mr. Justice Rajiv Narain Raina

  12. 05-Jan-2015

    Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj

  13. 25-Sep-2014

    Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj

  14. 01-Aug-2014

    Mr. Justice Fateh Deep Singh

  15. 30-Jun-2014

    Mr Justice Rakesh Kumar Garg

  16. 26-Mar-2014

    Mr. Justice Paramjeet Singh Dhaliwal

  17. 23-Jan-2014

    Mr. Justice Paramjeet Singh Dhaliwal

  18. 16-Jan-2014

    Mr. Justice Paramjeet Singh Dhaliwal

  19. 08-Jan-2014

    Mr. Justice S.C. Datta

  20. 14-Nov-2013

    Mr. Justice Mahavir Singh Chauhan

  21. 05-Oct-2013

    Mr. Justice Mahavir Singh Chauhan

  22. 01-Jul-2013

    Mr. Justice J.S. Narang

  23. 07-Jan-2013

    Mr. Justice S.J. Vazifdar

  24. 02-Jul-2012

    Mr. Justice S.J. Vazifdar

  25. 02-Jan-2012

    Mr. Justice Krishna Murari

  26. 30-Sep-2011

    Mr Justice Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia

  27. 04-Jul-2011

    Mr Justice Rakesh Kumar Garg

  28. 04-Jan-2011

    Mr Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain

  29. 28-Jun-2010

    Mr. Justice P.B. Bajanthri

  30. 06-Jan-2010

    Mr. Justice P.B. Bajanthri

  31. 30-Nov-2009

    Mr Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain

  32. 01-Jul-2009

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  33. 06-Nov-2008

    Case filed

    Registration No. RSA/2626/1996

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the second appeal by Jagir Singh and others, upholding the First Appellate Court's reversal of the trial court's judgment. The court held that the plaintiffs failed to establish that the disputed property was ancestral coparcenary property under Hindu law, as they produced no revenue pedigree or cogent evidence proving descent through successive generations. Additionally, the alleged family settlement lacked documentary or reliable oral testimony, and revenue entries showing the plaintiffs' possession only reflected their status as sons of the defendant (a co-sharer) rather than conferring independent ownership rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case