AMARJIT SINGH RK BATTAS vs KARTAR SINGH — RSA/1647/1997

Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 10th April 2026.

CNR: PHHC010392111997

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

RSA/1647/1997

Filing Date

05-05-5500

Registration No

RSA/1647/1997

Registration Date

05-05-5500

Judge

MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL

Coram

MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL

Bench Type

Single

Category

26 - RSA ( 496 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL II(RSA) BRANCH

Decision Date

10th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined

Petitioner(s)

AMARJIT SINGH RK BATTAS

Respondent(s)

KARTAR SINGH

Orders

10-04-2026
MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL

Summary: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the appellant's second appeal seeking specific performance of a 1988 land sale agreement. The court upheld the first appellate court's finding that the appellant failed to prove his "readiness and willingness" to perform the contract as required under Section 16 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. The court held that by attempting to deduct the mortgage amount from the sale consideration—despite knowing the land was mortgaged when entering the agreement—the appellant sought to alter the original contract terms rather than perform them as agreed, demonstrating lack of genuine readiness and willingness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the appellant's second appeal seeking specific performance of a 1988 land sale agreement. The court upheld the first appellate court's finding that the appellant failed to prove his "readiness and willingness" to perform the contract as required under Section 16 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. The court held that by attempting to deduct the mortgage amount from the sale consideration—despite knowing the land was mortgaged when entering the agreement—the appellant sought to alter the original contract terms rather than perform them as agreed, demonstrating lack of genuine readiness and willingness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case