SMALLWELL @SMALVEL@SAM vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/13373/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010391502026

Filing Number

CRM-M/16168/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/13373/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Judge

Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra

Coram

Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.1 - REGULAR BAIL (PUNJAB) ( 220 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMALLWELL @SMALVEL@SAM

    Adv. HAKIKAT SINGH GREWAL

  2. 2.SMALLWELL @ SMALVEL @ SAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.SMALLWELL @ SMALVEL @ SAM

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mrs. Justice Manisha BatraView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to the petitioner in a firearm attempt-to-murder case (IPC §307, 120B; Arms Act §25, 27) after finding that the primary complainant failed to identify him as one of the assailants during examination. The court emphasized that only one of 21 prosecution witnesses had been examined, trial conclusion is unlikely, the co-accused received bail on similar grounds, and pre-trial detention should not replicate post-conviction sentencing. Bail was granted subject to personal and surety bonds, appearance at all hearings, passport surrender, and restrictions on witness contact. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/13373/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to the petitioner in a firearm attempt-to-murder case (IPC §307, 120B; Arms Act §25, 27) after finding that the primary complainant failed to identify him as one of the assailants during examination. The court emphasized that only one of 21 prosecution witnesses had been examined, trial conclusion is unlikely, the co-accused received bail on similar grounds, and pre-trial detention should not replicate post-conviction sentencing. Bail was granted subject to personal and surety bonds, appearance at all hearings, passport surrender, and restrictions on witness contact. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case