C.S.BRAR vs JOGINDER SINGH AND ANR. — FAO/2698/2001

Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 16-Jul-2015

CNR: PHHC010390782001

Filing Number

FAO/2698/2001

Filing Date

22-Aug-2001

Registration No

FAO/2698/2001

Registration Date

22-Aug-2001

Judge

Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta

Coram

Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

500.21 - APPL FILED BY CLAIMANT FOR ENHANCE IN GEN CASES ( 886 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.C.S.BRAR

    Adv. VIKAS SURI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JOGINDER SINGH AND ANR.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Deepak GuptaView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed C.S. Brar's First Appeal in default on March 24, 2026, because court notice could not be served—the appellant was no longer residing at his registered address and no alternative address was available. The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the appellant's failure to appear or maintain proper contact with the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Aug-2015

    Lok Adalat Bench - 2

  4. 13-Aug-2015

    —

    Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh

  5. 08-Aug-2015

    Lok Adalat Bench - 2

  6. 08-Aug-2015

    —

    Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh

  7. 16-Jul-2015

    Lok Adalat Bench - 2

  8. 16-Jul-2015

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 22-Aug-2001

    Case filed

    Registration No. FAO/2698/2001

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed C.S. Brar's First Appeal in default on March 24, 2026, because court notice could not be served—the appellant was no longer residing at his registered address and no alternative address was available. The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the appellant's failure to appear or maintain proper contact with the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case