SHISO ETC. J.S.VIRK. vs MADAN LAL ETC. — RSA/1244/1997

Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010389861997

Filing Number

RSA/1244/1997

Filing Date

05-May-1997

Registration No

RSA/1244/1997

Registration Date

05-May-1997

Judge

Mr. Justice Virinder Aggarwal

Coram

Mr. Justice Virinder Aggarwal

Bench Type

Single

Category

26 - RSA ( 496 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL II(RSA) BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHISO ETC. J.S.VIRK.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MADAN LAL ETC.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Virinder AggarwalView PDF

    Case Summary: RSA/1244/1997 - Shiso v. Madan Lal The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the appellant's second appeal challenging a lower appellate court's reversal of a permanent injunction decree. The trial court had granted injunction protecting the plaintiff's alleged 35-year possession of agricultural property in Village Mangalpur, but the first appellate court set aside this decree, finding the plaintiff's testimony and supporting evidence unreliable. Justice Virinder Aggarwal upheld the first appellate court's decision, finding the plaintiff failed to establish possession. The plaintiff's own testimony contained material contradictions regarding property boundaries and topography; supporting witnesses were either coached or procedurally flawed; and critically, revenue records (Jamabandi) conspicuously omitted the appellant's name from the possession column and demarcation reports showed no construction by the plaintiff. Mere belonging to the Chamar community mentioned in revenue remarks did not vest possessory title. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-1997

    Case filed

    Registration No. RSA/1244/1997

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RSA/1244/1997 - Shiso v. Madan Lal The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the appellant's second appeal challenging a lower appellate court's reversal of a permanent injunction decree. The trial court had granted injunction protecting the plaintiff's alleged 35-year possession of agricultural property in Village Mangalpur, but the first appellate court set aside this decree, finding the plaintiff's testimony and supporting evidence unreliable. Justice Virinder Aggarwal upheld the first appellate court's decision, finding the plaintiff failed to establish possession. The plaintiff's own testimony contained material contradictions regarding property boundaries and topography; supporting witnesses were either coached or procedurally flawed; and critically, revenue records (Jamabandi) conspicuously omitted the appellant's name from the possession column and demarcation reports showed no construction by the plaintiff. Mere belonging to the Chamar community mentioned in revenue remarks did not vest possessory title. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case