PREMPAL SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER — CRM-M/13549/2026

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010387832026

Filing Number

CRM-M/16028/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/13549/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Judge

Ms. Justice Mandeep Pannu

Coram

Ms. Justice Mandeep Pannu

Bench Type

Single

Category

38.1 - QUASHING PETITIONS I/O ( 152 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PREMPAL SINGH

    Adv. SANDEEP KUMAR

  2. 2.PREMPAL SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.PREMPAL SINGH

  3. 3.JATINDER SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Ms. Justice Mandeep PannuView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M/13549/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Prempal Singh's petition challenging his summoning as an additional accused in a visa fraud case. Singh was accused of conspiring with others to defraud Jatinder Singh of ₹15 lakhs by falsely promising to send his daughter to Canada on a nanny course. Though initially cleared during police investigation and listed in column 2 of the charge sheet, the trial court summoned him as an additional accused based on the complainant's examination-in-chief testimony specifically alleging Singh's active involvement in meetings and money collection. The court upheld the summoning order, holding that Section 319 CrPC powers can be exercised based on examination-in-chief evidence alone, without awaiting cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/13549/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M/13549/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Prempal Singh's petition challenging his summoning as an additional accused in a visa fraud case. Singh was accused of conspiring with others to defraud Jatinder Singh of ₹15 lakhs by falsely promising to send his daughter to Canada on a nanny course. Though initially cleared during police investigation and listed in column 2 of the charge sheet, the trial court summoned him as an additional accused based on the complainant's examination-in-chief testimony specifically alleging Singh's active involvement in meetings and money collection. The court upheld the summoning order, holding that Section 319 CrPC powers can be exercised based on examination-in-chief evidence alone, without awaiting cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case