KASHMIR SINGH ALIAS RAJA ALIAS KATTU vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/13597/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010381122026

Filing Number

CRM-M/15698/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/13597/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Sumeet Goel

Coram

Mr. Justice Sumeet Goel

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.1 - REGULAR BAIL (PUNJAB) ( 220 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KASHMIR SINGH ALIAS RAJA ALIAS KATTU

    Adv. BALWANT SINGH

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Sumeet GoelView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M/13597/2026 Kashmir Singh was arrested on 15.02.2025 for murder and arms violations related to the death of Shamsher Singh at a water tank. The court found no tangible evidence linking the petitioner to the crime, noting that the primary prosecution witness (the victim's wife) turned hostile and only one of 30 cited witnesses had been examined. Justice Sumeet Goel granted regular bail, holding that continued detention was unjustified despite the serious charges, as there was insufficient grounds for presuming flight risk or evidence tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/13597/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M/13597/2026 Kashmir Singh was arrested on 15.02.2025 for murder and arms violations related to the death of Shamsher Singh at a water tank. The court found no tangible evidence linking the petitioner to the crime, noting that the primary prosecution witness (the victim's wife) turned hostile and only one of 30 cited witnesses had been examined. Justice Sumeet Goel granted regular bail, holding that continued detention was unjustified despite the serious charges, as there was insufficient grounds for presuming flight risk or evidence tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case