SARVJEET KAUR vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/12466/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010379752026

Filing Number

CRM-M/15655/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/12466/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Subhas Mehla

Coram

Mr. Justice Subhas Mehla

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.2 - REGULAR BAIL (HARYANA) ( 219 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SARVJEET KAUR

    Adv. Sumeet Singh Brar

  2. 2.SARVJEET KAUR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

  2. 2.SARVJEET KAUR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Subhas MehlaView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to Sarvjeet Kaur, who was arrested for possession of 7.45 grams of heroin under NDPS Act sections. The court found merit in the petition because the recovered quantity marginally exceeded "small quantity" threshold (including packaging weight), investigation was complete, and the petitioner had already served 7 months 19 days in custody with trial expected to take considerable time. The state's objection based on the petitioner being a habitual offender was overruled, applying the principle that "bail is rule, jail is exception," with the caveat that bail could be cancelled if new NDPS offences occur. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/12466/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to Sarvjeet Kaur, who was arrested for possession of 7.45 grams of heroin under NDPS Act sections. The court found merit in the petition because the recovered quantity marginally exceeded "small quantity" threshold (including packaging weight), investigation was complete, and the petitioner had already served 7 months 19 days in custody with trial expected to take considerable time. The state's objection based on the petitioner being a habitual offender was overruled, applying the principle that "bail is rule, jail is exception," with the caveat that bail could be cancelled if new NDPS offences occur. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case