KULDEEP SINGH ALIAS BABBU vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER — CRWP/2537/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 21st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010379002026

e-Filing Number

27-02-2026

Filing Number

CRWP/15590/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRWP/2537/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara , Mrs. Justice Sukhvinder Kaur

Coram

Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara , Mrs. Justice Sukhvinder Kaur

Bench Type

Double

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

42.3 - PAROLE ( 312 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

21-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 28-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KULDEEP SINGH ALIAS BABBU

    Adv. VIKRAM SATPAL ANAND

  2. 2.KULDEEP SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

  3. 3.IGP, PRISONS, PUNJAB

  4. 4.DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, TARN TARAN

  5. 5.SSP, TARN TARAN

  6. 6.SUPERINTENDENT CENTRAL JAIL, BATHINDA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara,mrs. Justice Sukhvinder KaurView PDF

    The Punjab and Haryana High Court allowed Kuldeep Singh's petition and granted him 8-week parole, setting aside the Deputy Commissioner's rejection order. The court found that the authorities' apprehension regarding threats to state security and public order lacked material basis and were mere conjecture, requiring concrete evidence and reasoned satisfaction rather than generalized assumptions. The petitioner was released subject to furnishing surety bonds and compliance with parole conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRWP/2537/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Punjab and Haryana High Court allowed Kuldeep Singh's petition and granted him 8-week parole, setting aside the Deputy Commissioner's rejection order. The court found that the authorities' apprehension regarding threats to state security and public order lacked material basis and were mere conjecture, requiring concrete evidence and reasoned satisfaction rather than generalized assumptions. The petitioner was released subject to furnishing surety bonds and compliance with parole conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case