NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. vs RAJIV @ DEEPAK & ORS. — FAO/1665/2001

Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010378442001

Filing Number

FAO/1665/2001

Filing Date

23-May-2001

Registration No

FAO/1665/2001

Registration Date

23-May-2001

Judge

Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta

Coram

Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta

Bench Type

Double

Category

93.1 - GOVT. SERVICE ( 134 )

Sub-Category

( 921 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.

    Adv. PRADEEP BEDI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJIV @ DEEPAK & ORS.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Deepak GuptaView PDF

    Summary of FAO/1665/2001: National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Rajiv @ Deepak & Ors. The High Court of Punjab and Haryana upheld the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's finding that the truck driver was rash and negligent in causing a 1998 accident that killed three persons and injured another, and rejected the insurance company's defense that the driver's license was invalid. The court dismissed the insurer's appeals while partly allowing claimants' appeals for enhanced compensation by recalculating awards using updated legal principles for loss of dependency, future prospects, and consortium. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-May-2001

    Case filed

    Registration No. FAO/1665/2001

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of FAO/1665/2001: National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Rajiv @ Deepak & Ors. The High Court of Punjab and Haryana upheld the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's finding that the truck driver was rash and negligent in causing a 1998 accident that killed three persons and injured another, and rejected the insurance company's defense that the driver's license was invalid. The court dismissed the insurer's appeals while partly allowing claimants' appeals for enhanced compensation by recalculating awards using updated legal principles for loss of dependency, future prospects, and consortium. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case