NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. vs SAVITA DEVI AND ORS. — FAO/1663/2001
Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 13th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010378422001
Filing Number
FAO/1663/2001
Filing Date
23-May-2001
Registration No
FAO/1663/2001
Registration Date
23-May-2001
Judge
Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta
Coram
Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta
Bench Type
Single
Category
500.2 - NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY ( 885 )
Sub-Category
( 944 )
Judicial Branch
CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I
Decision Date
13-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.
Adv. PRADEEP BEDI
Respondent(s)
-
1.SAVITA DEVI AND ORS.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-May-2026
Mr. Justice Deepak GuptaView PDF
FAO/1663/2001: National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Savita Devi and Ors. Decision: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed National Insurance Company's appeal challenging the validity of the truck driver's license, affirming that the insurance company failed to prove the license was fake or invalid. The court enhanced compensation for death claims by applying proper multipliers and future prospects additions per Supreme Court precedent, awarding claimants enhanced amounts with 7.5% annual interest from claim filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Feb-2016
Mr. Justice K.kannanView PDF
-
05-Jan-2016
—
Mr. Justice Harbans Singh Rai
-
23-May-2001
Case filed
Registration No. FAO/1663/2001
FAO/1663/2001: National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Savita Devi and Ors. Decision: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed National Insurance Company's appeal challenging the validity of the truck driver's license, affirming that the insurance company failed to prove the license was fake or invalid. The court enhanced compensation for death claims by applying proper multipliers and future prospects additions per Supreme Court precedent, awarding claimants enhanced amounts with 7.5% annual interest from claim filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts