GAGANDEEP SINGH ALIAS GAGGU ALIAS HADI vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/12590/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010373382026

Filing Number

CRM-M/15230/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/12590/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Judge

Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra

Coram

Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.1 - REGULAR BAIL (PUNJAB) ( 220 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 12-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GAGANDEEP SINGH ALIAS GAGGU ALIAS HADI

    Adv. RISHU MAHAJAN

  2. 2.GAGANDEEP SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.GAGANDEEP SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Mrs. Justice Manisha BatraView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted bail to Gagandeep Singh in an NDPS drug smuggling case, despite his previous bail petition being dismissed. The court found that the petitioner's prolonged incarceration (over 2 years, 3 months) combined with slow trial progress (no prosecution witnesses examined) constituted grounds for bail, overriding Section 37 of the NDPS Act based on constitutional principles under Article 21 and recent Supreme Court precedents emphasizing that indefinite detention cannot be justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/12590/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted bail to Gagandeep Singh in an NDPS drug smuggling case, despite his previous bail petition being dismissed. The court found that the petitioner's prolonged incarceration (over 2 years, 3 months) combined with slow trial progress (no prosecution witnesses examined) constituted grounds for bail, overriding Section 37 of the NDPS Act based on constitutional principles under Article 21 and recent Supreme Court precedents emphasizing that indefinite detention cannot be justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case