PRITPAL KAUR vs BALJINDER SINGH DHILLON, PCS — COCP/989/2026

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 24-Mar-2026

CNR: PHHC010372562026

Filing Number

COCP/12483/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

COCP/989/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Judge

Ms. Justice Nidhi Gupta

Coram

Ms. Justice Nidhi Gupta

Bench Type

Single

Category

34 - CIVIL CONTEMPTS ( 564 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRITPAL KAUR

    Adv. RAJINDER SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BALJINDER SINGH DHILLON, PCS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Ms. Justice Nidhi GuptaView PDF

    Case Summary: COCP/989/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of Pritpal Kaur's contempt petition against Baljinder Singh Dhillon, PCS, after finding that the respondent had complied with a prior Writ Court order requiring decision on a legal notice dated 26.05.2025 within eight weeks. The respondent submitted a compliance report showing the legal notice was decided via Speaking Order dated 16.03.2026, rendering the contempt petition moot. The court discharged the rule and disposed of the petition, permitting petitioners to challenge the Speaking Order if they wish to pursue further relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. COCP/989/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: COCP/989/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of Pritpal Kaur's contempt petition against Baljinder Singh Dhillon, PCS, after finding that the respondent had complied with a prior Writ Court order requiring decision on a legal notice dated 26.05.2025 within eight weeks. The respondent submitted a compliance report showing the legal notice was decided via Speaking Order dated 16.03.2026, rendering the contempt petition moot. The court discharged the rule and disposed of the petition, permitting petitioners to challenge the Speaking Order if they wish to pursue further relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case