RAJINDER SINGH AND ANR vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CRWP/2484/2026
Disposed: --DISMISSED on 24th March 2026.
CNR: PHHC010370842026
Filing Number
CRWP/15117/2026
Filing Date
05-Mar-2026
Registration No
CRWP/2484/2026
Registration Date
05-Mar-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Sumeet Goel
Coram
Mr. Justice Sumeet Goel
Bench Type
Single
Category
42.1 - CRIMINAL WRIT (HABEAS CORPUS) ( 311 )
Sub-Category
( 944 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL BRANCH
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISMISSED
Last updated 11-Apr-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJINDER SINGH AND ANR
Adv. SANDEEP CHOPRA
-
2.RAJINDER SINGH
-
3.AMANDEEP SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
-
2.STATE OF PUNJAB
-
3.SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
-
4.SHO (Station House Officer), PS (Police Station) SADAR PATIALA
-
5.INCHARGE, POLICE POST, BHUNERHERI
-
6.SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
-
7.SHO (Station House Officer), PS (Police Station) SHAHBAD,
-
8.SUNIL KUMAR
-
9.RAJIV KUMAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Mr. Justice Sumeet GoelView PDF
Case Summary: CRWP No.2484 of 2026 The petitioner filed a habeas corpus petition seeking release of Gurpreet Kaur from alleged illegal detention by private respondent Sunil Kumar. However, upon court interaction, Gurpreet Kaur submitted that she is a major living peacefully with respondent No.7 of her own accord without any pressure. The petitioner's counsel subsequently sought withdrawal of the petition, which was allowed by Justice Sumeet Goel, with the court clarifying that the withdrawal does not constitute any opinion on merits and petitioners retain the right to pursue other available legal remedies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRWP/2484/2026
Case Summary: CRWP No.2484 of 2026 The petitioner filed a habeas corpus petition seeking release of Gurpreet Kaur from alleged illegal detention by private respondent Sunil Kumar. However, upon court interaction, Gurpreet Kaur submitted that she is a major living peacefully with respondent No.7 of her own accord without any pressure. The petitioner's counsel subsequently sought withdrawal of the petition, which was allowed by Justice Sumeet Goel, with the court clarifying that the withdrawal does not constitute any opinion on merits and petitioners retain the right to pursue other available legal remedies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts