SWARAN KAUR vs JAGDISH RAM AND ORS. — RSA/598/1995

Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 15th May 2026.

CNR: PHHC010369681995

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

RSA/598/1995

Filing Date

05-05-5500

Registration No

RSA/598/1995

Registration Date

05-05-5500

Judge

MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA

Coram

MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA

Bench Type

Single

Category

26 - RSA ( 496 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL II(RSA) BRANCH

Decision Date

15th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined

Petitioner(s)

SWARAN KAUR

Adv. L.N. VERMA

Respondent(s)

JAGDISH RAM AND ORS.

Orders

15-05-2026
MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA

Case Summary: RSA/598/1995 - Swaran Kaur v. Jagdish Ram The Punjab & Haryana High Court dismissed Swaran Kaur's pre-emption suits against land sales, finding the foundational decree establishing her co-sharership status was collusive. The court determined that a 1990 decree creating her property rights was deliberately engineered to defeat prior contractual rights of the defendants-vendees, making it void as to third parties. Additionally, the suits suffered from non-impleadment of necessary vendors and failure to prove notice requirements, rendering the pre-emption claims unenforceable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RSA/598/1995 - Swaran Kaur v. Jagdish Ram The Punjab & Haryana High Court dismissed Swaran Kaur's pre-emption suits against land sales, finding the foundational decree establishing her co-sharership status was collusive. The court determined that a 1990 decree creating her property rights was deliberately engineered to defeat prior contractual rights of the defendants-vendees, making it void as to third parties. Additionally, the suits suffered from non-impleadment of necessary vendors and failure to prove notice requirements, rendering the pre-emption claims unenforceable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case