JATIN SHARMA vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/12729/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010368802026

Filing Number

CRM-M/15015/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/12729/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Judge

Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra

Coram

Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.2 - REGULAR BAIL (HARYANA) ( 219 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JATIN SHARMA

    Adv. R.S. KUNDU

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mrs. Justice Manisha BatraView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M/12729/2026 Court Decision: The High Court of Punjab & Haryana granted regular bail to Jatin Sharma, who was accused of participating in a violent group assault that caused grievous injuries to the victim. Although the allegations make out a prima facie case involving unlawful assembly and intent to kill, the court found that Sharma's seven-month pre-trial custody was excessive and no fruitful purpose would be served by further detention, especially since trial conclusion appears distant. Key Reasoning: Justice Manisha Batra applied the principle that bail is the rule and jail is the exception, noting that pre-trial incarceration should not function as punishment. The court ordered Sharma's release subject to furnishing personal/surety bonds, while clarifying this decision expressed no opinion on case merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/12729/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M/12729/2026 Court Decision: The High Court of Punjab & Haryana granted regular bail to Jatin Sharma, who was accused of participating in a violent group assault that caused grievous injuries to the victim. Although the allegations make out a prima facie case involving unlawful assembly and intent to kill, the court found that Sharma's seven-month pre-trial custody was excessive and no fruitful purpose would be served by further detention, especially since trial conclusion appears distant. Key Reasoning: Justice Manisha Batra applied the principle that bail is the rule and jail is the exception, noting that pre-trial incarceration should not function as punishment. The court ordered Sharma's release subject to furnishing personal/surety bonds, while clarifying this decision expressed no opinion on case merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case