PINKI DEVI vs DR LALA RAM POOJA MEDICAL STORE DISPENSARY — CWP/6672/2026

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 13-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010359582026

e-Filing Number

26-02-2026

Filing Number

CWP/11898/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

CWP/6672/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Coram

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Bench Type

Single

Category

63.13 - MISC. HARYANA ( 739 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PINKI DEVI

    Adv. ROHIT MITTAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DR LALA RAM POOJA MEDICAL STORE DISPENSARY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Jagmohan BansalView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP/6672/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Pinki Devi's petition challenging a Permanent Lok Adalat's award that rejected her medical negligence claim against a dispensary. The Lok Adalat had concluded that since the petitioner did not obtain treatment from any other hospital, medical records did not support her claim for compensation following adverse effects from administered medicine. The High Court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution after the petitioner failed to appear despite two adjournments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/6672/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP/6672/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Pinki Devi's petition challenging a Permanent Lok Adalat's award that rejected her medical negligence claim against a dispensary. The Lok Adalat had concluded that since the petitioner did not obtain treatment from any other hospital, medical records did not support her claim for compensation following adverse effects from administered medicine. The High Court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution after the petitioner failed to appear despite two adjournments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case