MOHIT ALIAS MOHIT KUMAR vs ELECTION COMMISSION, HARYANA AND OTHERS — CWP/6244/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 12th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010359342025
e-Filing Number
04-03-2025
Filing Number
CWP/13618/2025
Filing Date
04-Mar-2025
Registration No
CWP/6244/2025
Registration Date
04-Mar-2025
Judge
Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara , Mrs. Justice Sukhvinder Kaur
Coram
Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara , Mrs. Justice Sukhvinder Kaur
Bench Type
Double
Category
99 ( 945 )
Sub-Category
7 - ELECTION MATTERS ( 403 )
Judicial Branch
WRITS -I BRANCH
Decision Date
12-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MOHIT ALIAS MOHIT KUMAR
Adv. KESHAV PRATAP SINGH
-
2.Election Commission, Haryana and others
Respondent(s)
-
1.ELECTION COMMISSION, HARYANA AND OTHERS
-
2.Election Commission, Haryana and others
-
3.Returning Officer
-
4.Parveen Kumar
-
5.RAJINDER
-
6.NAVEEN
-
7.DHARAMPAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-May-2026
Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara,mrs. Justice Sukhvinder KaurView PDF
Case Summary: CWP/6244/2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of petitioner Mohit Kumar's writ petition seeking to set aside an Additional District Judge's order directing vote recounting. The petitioner requested withdrawal after the vote recount was completed and he was declared the returned candidate, with respondents consenting to record his submissions. The court allowed withdrawal with liberty to approach the court again or revive the petition if necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Mar-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/6244/2025
Case Summary: CWP/6244/2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of petitioner Mohit Kumar's writ petition seeking to set aside an Additional District Judge's order directing vote recounting. The petitioner requested withdrawal after the vote recount was completed and he was declared the returned candidate, with respondents consenting to record his submissions. The court allowed withdrawal with liberty to approach the court again or revive the petition if necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts