CHAMKAUR SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/13438/2026

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010356252026

Filing Number

CRM-M/14396/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/13438/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Judge

Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra

Coram

Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.1 - REGULAR BAIL (PUNJAB) ( 220 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHAMKAUR SINGH

    Adv. IMAAN SINGH KHARA

  2. 2.CHAMKAUR SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.CHAMKAUR SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    Mrs. Justice Manisha BatraView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M/13438/2026 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed Chamkaur Singh's bail petition on 15.05.2026. The petitioner was arrested for allegedly assaulting a complainant as part of an unlawful assembly armed with lethal weapons, causing grievous injuries including permanent eye damage. The court found prima facie evidence of the petitioner's participation in the violent attack and his knowledge that such offences were likely to occur in furtherance of the common object. Considering the serious nature of allegations, severity of injuries, risk of witness intimidation, and evidence against the petitioner, the court declined bail as a matter of discretion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/13438/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M/13438/2026 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed Chamkaur Singh's bail petition on 15.05.2026. The petitioner was arrested for allegedly assaulting a complainant as part of an unlawful assembly armed with lethal weapons, causing grievous injuries including permanent eye damage. The court found prima facie evidence of the petitioner's participation in the violent attack and his knowledge that such offences were likely to occur in furtherance of the common object. Considering the serious nature of allegations, severity of injuries, risk of witness intimidation, and evidence against the petitioner, the court declined bail as a matter of discretion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case