MANJEET KAUR vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER — CWP/6579/2026

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 11-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010353852026

e-Filing Number

25-02-2026

Filing Number

CWP/11659/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

CWP/6579/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Coram

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Bench Type

Single

Category

63.63 - CASES RELATING TO ALL KINDS OF COMPENSATION ( 756 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANJEET KAUR

    Adv. ROHIT KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Jagmohan BansalView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP/6579/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed Manjeet Kaur's petition and directed the State of Haryana to release financial assistance of Rs. 5,00,000 under the Deen Dayal Upadhaya Antyodaya Parivar Suraksha Yojana (DAYALU) within 4 weeks. The court rejected the State's rejection of her claim based on age discrepancies in official documents (38 years vs. 41 years 3 months), holding that since the deceased fell within the scheme's eligibility bracket (25-45 years) under either age figure, benefits should not be denied on procedural grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/6579/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP/6579/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed Manjeet Kaur's petition and directed the State of Haryana to release financial assistance of Rs. 5,00,000 under the Deen Dayal Upadhaya Antyodaya Parivar Suraksha Yojana (DAYALU) within 4 weeks. The court rejected the State's rejection of her claim based on age discrepancies in official documents (38 years vs. 41 years 3 months), holding that since the deceased fell within the scheme's eligibility bracket (25-45 years) under either age figure, benefits should not be denied on procedural grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case