GAURAV GUPTA vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/13569/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 21st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010353512026

Filing Number

CRM-M/14209/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/13569/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Judge

Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra

Coram

Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra

Bench Type

Single

Category

40.2 - REGULAR BAIL (HARYANA) ( 219 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

21-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 28-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GAURAV GUPTA

    Adv. SANJEEV MAJRA

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Mrs. Justice Manisha BatraView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M No. 13569/2026 Decision: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed Gaurav Gupta's bail petition. Though accused of harboring absconding murder suspect Harneet Singh by providing shelter, food, and Rs. 10,000 financial support for three months, the court found Gupta's role limited and distinct from the principal murder offense, resting primarily on co-accused's disclosure statement and circumstantial evidence rather than direct participation. Conditions: Bail granted subject to personal and surety bonds, court appearance at all hearings, no evidence tampering or witness influence, and no overseas travel without permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/13569/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M No. 13569/2026 Decision: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed Gaurav Gupta's bail petition. Though accused of harboring absconding murder suspect Harneet Singh by providing shelter, food, and Rs. 10,000 financial support for three months, the court found Gupta's role limited and distinct from the principal murder offense, resting primarily on co-accused's disclosure statement and circumstantial evidence rather than direct participation. Conditions: Bail granted subject to personal and surety bonds, court appearance at all hearings, no evidence tampering or witness influence, and no overseas travel without permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case