GURWINDER SINGH @ BABBU vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/11700/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 12th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 10-Mar-2026

CNR: PHHC010351582026

Filing Number

CRM-M/14149/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/11700/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Subhas Mehla

Coram

Mr. Justice Subhas Mehla

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.1 - REGULAR BAIL (PUNJAB) ( 220 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

12-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GURWINDER SINGH @ BABBU

    Adv. HIMANSHU BANSAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Subhas MehlaView PDF

    Summary of CRM-M/11700/2026: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to Gurwinder Singh @ Babbu in an NDPS Act case after his previous bail was cancelled due to non-appearance at trial. The court found merit in the petition considering that he had been in custody for six months, was originally granted bail on merits, and the trial would take considerable time. The court held that bail cannot be denied merely as punishment and applied the principle that "bail is rule, jail is exception," ordering his release on furnishing requisite bonds with conditions to ensure trial attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/11700/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CRM-M/11700/2026: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to Gurwinder Singh @ Babbu in an NDPS Act case after his previous bail was cancelled due to non-appearance at trial. The court found merit in the petition considering that he had been in custody for six months, was originally granted bail on merits, and the trial would take considerable time. The court held that bail cannot be denied merely as punishment and applied the principle that "bail is rule, jail is exception," ordering his release on furnishing requisite bonds with conditions to ensure trial attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case