NARAINI DEVI S S GODARA vs PRESIDING OFFICER AND ANR — CWP/7575/2002

Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 14th May 2026.

CNR: PHHC010350612002

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

09th January 2017

Filing Number

CWP/7575/2002

Filing Date

05-05-5500

Registration No

CWP/7575/2002

Registration Date

05-05-5500

Judge

MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA

Coram

MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA

Bench Type

Single

Category

31.2 - MUNICIPAL & PANCHAYAT LAWS ( 559 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

14th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined

Petitioner(s)

NARAINI DEVI S S GODARA

Respondent(s)

PRESIDING OFFICER AND ANR

Hearing History

Judge: MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA

09-01-2017
07-01-2019
30-10-2018
10-10-2018
02-07-2018

Orders

14-05-2026
MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI,MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA

Summary of CWP/7575/2002 - NARAINI DEVI v. PRESIDING OFFICER: The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Panchayat Election Disputes Tribunal's order that had rejected Naraini Devi's election petition and vote recount request for Sarpanch of village Daiyar, Fatehabad. The court dismissed the case for non-prosecution after the petitioner failed to appear before the court and the election term had already concluded, presuming she was no longer interested in pursuing the remedy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CWP/7575/2002 - NARAINI DEVI v. PRESIDING OFFICER: The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Panchayat Election Disputes Tribunal's order that had rejected Naraini Devi's election petition and vote recount request for Sarpanch of village Daiyar, Fatehabad. The court dismissed the case for non-prosecution after the petitioner failed to appear before the court and the election term had already concluded, presuming she was no longer interested in pursuing the remedy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case