KULDEEP SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/12477/2026

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010350452026

Filing Number

CRM-M/14080/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/12477/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Judge

Justice (To Be Nominated)

Coram

Justice (To Be Nominated)

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.17 - REGULAR BAIL PUNJAB (AGNST WOMEN) ( 286 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KULDEEP SINGH

    Adv. SUNNY SAGGAR

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Justice (To Be Nominated)View PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M/12477/2026 The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed Kuldeep Singh's bail petition in a dowry-related death case. Singh, accused under Section 80 of BNS (later amended to Section 61) for allegedly harassing his wife over insufficient dowry, leading to her suicide within seven years of marriage, was denied bail due to the gravity of allegations, prima facie evidence of his involvement including an audio recording of the deceased mentioning harassment by her husband's family, and the early trial stage with 19 prosecution witnesses still to be examined. The court held that releasing him could compromise fair trial and allow witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/12477/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M/12477/2026 The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed Kuldeep Singh's bail petition in a dowry-related death case. Singh, accused under Section 80 of BNS (later amended to Section 61) for allegedly harassing his wife over insufficient dowry, leading to her suicide within seven years of marriage, was denied bail due to the gravity of allegations, prima facie evidence of his involvement including an audio recording of the deceased mentioning harassment by her husband's family, and the early trial stage with 19 prosecution witnesses still to be examined. The court held that releasing him could compromise fair trial and allow witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case