DALIP KUMAR vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/11468/2026
Disposed: --ALLOWED on 12th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010343472026
Filing Number
CRM-M/13708/2026
Filing Date
25-Feb-2026
Registration No
CRM-M/11468/2026
Registration Date
25-Feb-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Subhas Mehla
Coram
Mr. Justice Subhas Mehla
Bench Type
Single
Category
40.1 - REGULAR BAIL (PUNJAB) ( 220 )
Sub-Category
( 944 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL BRANCH
Decision Date
12-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--ALLOWED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DALIP KUMAR
Adv. NASEEM YADLAPATI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF PUNJAB
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-May-2026
Mr. Justice Subhas MehlaView PDF
Case Summary: CRM-M-11468/2026 The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted regular bail to Dalip Kumar in his second bail petition for a drugs case (FIR No. 81 under NDPS Act, 1985) involving 270 Etizolam tablets. The court found merit based on the petitioner's 2 years 5 months prolonged custody, repeated prosecution adjournments over one year without concluding evidence, clean criminal record, co-accused already granted bail, and likely lengthy trial duration—noting that delayed trial violates Article 21 rights and bail is the rule, not punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRM-M/11468/2026
Case Summary: CRM-M-11468/2026 The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted regular bail to Dalip Kumar in his second bail petition for a drugs case (FIR No. 81 under NDPS Act, 1985) involving 270 Etizolam tablets. The court found merit based on the petitioner's 2 years 5 months prolonged custody, repeated prosecution adjournments over one year without concluding evidence, clean criminal record, co-accused already granted bail, and likely lengthy trial duration—noting that delayed trial violates Article 21 rights and bail is the rule, not punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts