NEELAM AND ORS. vs PAWAN KUMAR AND ORS. — FAO/1510/2022

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 173. Disposed: --ALLOWED on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010343442022

Filing Number

FAO/13887/2022

Filing Date

01-Apr-2022

Registration No

FAO/1510/2022

Registration Date

05-Apr-2022

Judge

Mrs. Justice Sudeepti Sharma

Coram

Mrs. Justice Sudeepti Sharma

Bench Type

Single

Category

500.54 - APPL FILED BY CLAIMANT FOR ENHANCE IN GEN CASES ( 919 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 173

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NEELAM AND ORS.

    Adv. VINOD GUPTA

  2. 2.MOHIT

  3. 3.ANKUSH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PAWAN KUMAR AND ORS.

  2. 2.CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED

  3. 3.KALO DEVI

  4. 4.RAJA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Mrs. Justice Sudeepti SharmaView PDF

    Case Summary: FAO/1510/2022 The Punjab & Haryana High Court allowed the appeal and enhanced motor accident compensation from Rs.21,31,900 to Rs.22,92,080 for death of a 38-year-old male (Ram Mehar) in a 2018 vehicular accident. The court increased amounts under loss of estate, funeral expenses, and consortium heads per Supreme Court precedent, while upholding the income assessment and multiplier. The insurance company was directed to pay with 9% interest, with recovery rights against the vehicle owner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. FAO/1510/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: FAO/1510/2022 The Punjab & Haryana High Court allowed the appeal and enhanced motor accident compensation from Rs.21,31,900 to Rs.22,92,080 for death of a 38-year-old male (Ram Mehar) in a 2018 vehicular accident. The court increased amounts under loss of estate, funeral expenses, and consortium heads per Supreme Court precedent, while upholding the income assessment and multiplier. The insurance company was directed to pay with 9% interest, with recovery rights against the vehicle owner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case