VARINDER KUMAR vs UT OF CHANDIGARH AND ANOTHER — CRM-M/12392/2025

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010341562025

Filing Number

CRM-M/18160/2025

Filing Date

01-Mar-2025

Registration No

CRM-M/12392/2025

Registration Date

03-Mar-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal

Coram

Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal

Bench Type

Single

Category

38.21 - QUASHING PETITION COMPROMISE U/S 482 CRPC GEN ( 641 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VARINDER KUMAR

    Adv. VIVEK KATHURIA

  2. 2.U.T CHANDIGARH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UT OF CHANDIGARH AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.U.T CHANDIGARH

  3. 3.JASWINDER SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    Mr. Justice H.S. GrewalView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana quashed FIR No. 101 dated 12.06.2023 under Section 420 IPC against petitioner Varinder Kumar, finding that parties had voluntarily compromised the fraud case without coercion. After the Magistrate's report confirmed the compromise's genuineness and both State counsel and respondent No. 2 did not dispute it, the court found no useful purpose in continuing trial proceedings and allowed the petition under established precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/12392/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana quashed FIR No. 101 dated 12.06.2023 under Section 420 IPC against petitioner Varinder Kumar, finding that parties had voluntarily compromised the fraud case without coercion. After the Magistrate's report confirmed the compromise's genuineness and both State counsel and respondent No. 2 did not dispute it, the court found no useful purpose in continuing trial proceedings and allowed the petition under established precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case