TAJ ALI GM UMAIR vs RATTAN ETC. — RSA/3400/2002

Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 15-Feb-2005

CNR: PHHC010335222002

Filing Number

RSA/3400/2002

Filing Date

05-May-5500

Registration No

RSA/3400/2002

Registration Date

05-May-5500

Judge

Mr. Justice Virinder Aggarwal

Coram

Mr. Justice Virinder Aggarwal

Bench Type

Single

Category

26 - RSA ( 496 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL II(RSA) BRANCH

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TAJ ALI GM UMAIR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RATTAN ETC.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-5500

    Case filed

    Registration No. RSA/3400/2002

  3. 14-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Virinder AggarwalView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the appeal filed by Taj Ali against Rattan Chand for want of prosecution on May 14, 2026. The appellant failed to appear despite proper notice served through his son, and the respondent had expired, indicating both parties had abandoned the case. All pending miscellaneous applications were also disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 10-Jul-2013

    Mr. Justice G.C. Garg (Retd.)

  5. 10-Jul-2013

    —

    Mr. Justice Dharam Vir Sehgal

  6. 14-May-2013

    Mr. Justice G.C. Garg (Retd.)

  7. 14-May-2013

    —

    Mr. Justice Dharam Vir Sehgal

  8. 05-Apr-2013

    —

  9. 05-Apr-2013

    —

    Mr. Justice Dharam Vir Sehgal

  10. 06-May-2005

    —

    Mr. Justice Adarsh Kumar Goel

  11. 15-Feb-2005

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the appeal filed by Taj Ali against Rattan Chand for want of prosecution on May 14, 2026. The appellant failed to appear despite proper notice served through his son, and the respondent had expired, indicating both parties had abandoned the case. All pending miscellaneous applications were also disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case