RANJODH SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/10891/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 24-Mar-2026

CNR: PHHC010325682026

Filing Number

CRM-M/12906/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/10891/2026

Registration Date

23-Feb-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Sumeet Goel

Coram

Mr. Justice Sumeet Goel

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

39 - ANTICIPATORY BAILS ( 144 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RANJODH SINGH

    Adv. SAURAV BHATIA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Sumeet GoelView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M /10891/2026 - Ranjodh Singh v. State of Punjab The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted anticipatory bail to Ranjodh Singh, who faced charges under Sections 318(4)/61(2) BNS 2023 for alleged offenses at Majitha Police Station, Amritsar. The court confirmed its interim order dated 24.2.2026, noting the petitioner had already joined investigation and was no longer required for custodial interrogation. The bail was made absolute subject to conditions under Section 482(2) BNSS, with liberty reserved for the State/complainant to cancel it if conditions are violated, clarifying the order applies only to the specified FIR and does not constitute blanket protection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/10891/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M /10891/2026 - Ranjodh Singh v. State of Punjab The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted anticipatory bail to Ranjodh Singh, who faced charges under Sections 318(4)/61(2) BNS 2023 for alleged offenses at Majitha Police Station, Amritsar. The court confirmed its interim order dated 24.2.2026, noting the petitioner had already joined investigation and was no longer required for custodial interrogation. The bail was made absolute subject to conditions under Section 482(2) BNSS, with liberty reserved for the State/complainant to cancel it if conditions are violated, clarifying the order applies only to the specified FIR and does not constitute blanket protection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case