ISHFAQ MUGAL @ ASHFAQ AHMED vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/11418/2026
Disposed: --ALLOWED on 21st April 2026.
CNR: PHHC010325602026
Next Hearing
09th March 2026
Filing Number
CRM-M/12895/2026
Filing Date
23-02-2026
Registration No
CRM-M/11418/2026
Registration Date
25-02-2026
Judge
MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA
Coram
MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA
Bench Type
Single
Category
99 ( 945 )
Sub-Category
40.1 - REGULAR BAIL (PUNJAB) ( 220 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL BRANCH
Decision Date
21st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
--ALLOWED
Petitioner(s)
ISHFAQ MUGAL @ ASHFAQ AHMED
Adv. Randeep Singh
Respondent(s)
STATE OF PUNJAB
Orders
Case Summary: CRM-M No. 11418/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted bail to Ishfaq Mugal (alias Ashfaq Ahmed) in a drug trafficking case under NDPS Act sections 21, 27-A, 29, and IPC section 201. Although the petitioner's earlier bail plea was dismissed in July 2025, Justice Manisha Batra allowed the second petition, emphasizing that prolonged incarceration (approximately 1 year 11 months 12 days) coupled with slow trial progress (only 3 of 30 prosecution witnesses examined) warranted bail consideration despite serious charges involving heroin recovery and Rs. 3 lakhs drug money. The court held that constitutional protections under Article 21 override Section 37 NDPS restrictions when detention becomes unduly prolonged, citing Supreme Court precedents favoring bail over jail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CRM-M No. 11418/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted bail to Ishfaq Mugal (alias Ashfaq Ahmed) in a drug trafficking case under NDPS Act sections 21, 27-A, 29, and IPC section 201. Although the petitioner's earlier bail plea was dismissed in July 2025, Justice Manisha Batra allowed the second petition, emphasizing that prolonged incarceration (approximately 1 year 11 months 12 days) coupled with slow trial progress (only 3 of 30 prosecution witnesses examined) warranted bail consideration despite serious charges involving heroin recovery and Rs. 3 lakhs drug money. The court held that constitutional protections under Article 21 override Section 37 NDPS restrictions when detention becomes unduly prolonged, citing Supreme Court precedents favoring bail over jail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts