RANJIT SINGH ALIAS BAGGO vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/10803/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 10-Apr-2026

CNR: PHHC010317272026

Filing Number

CRM-M/12510/2026

Filing Date

20-Feb-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/10803/2026

Registration Date

21-Feb-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal

Coram

Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.1 - REGULAR BAIL (PUNJAB) ( 220 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 12-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RANJIT SINGH ALIAS BAGGO

    Adv. RUHANI CHADHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice H.S. GrewalView PDF

    Summary: The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted regular bail to Ranjit Singh (alias Baggo) in an NDPS drug case where 255 gms of heroin was recovered. The court found that after 3 years, 3 months, and 11 days in custody, only 5 of 11 prosecution witnesses had been examined, official witnesses were not appearing despite non-bailable warrants, and trial conclusion would take considerable time—constituting punishment without trial. Relying on Supreme Court precedent, the court ordered his release on furnishing bail bonds, clarifying this decision expressed no opinion on case merits and bail could be cancelled if he commits further offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/10803/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted regular bail to Ranjit Singh (alias Baggo) in an NDPS drug case where 255 gms of heroin was recovered. The court found that after 3 years, 3 months, and 11 days in custody, only 5 of 11 prosecution witnesses had been examined, official witnesses were not appearing despite non-bailable warrants, and trial conclusion would take considerable time—constituting punishment without trial. Relying on Supreme Court precedent, the court ordered his release on furnishing bail bonds, clarifying this decision expressed no opinion on case merits and bail could be cancelled if he commits further offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case