MURTI NARENDER SHURA vs BALJIT SINGH — FAO/2085/2003
Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 11th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010308242003
Filing Number
FAO/2085/2003
Filing Date
21-May-2003
Registration No
FAO/2085/2003
Registration Date
21-May-2003
Judge
Mr. Justice G.C. Garg (Retd.)
Coram
Mr. Justice G.C. Garg (Retd.)
Bench Type
Single
Category
500.24 - APPL FILED BY CLAIMANT FOR ENHANCE IN GEN CASES ( 889 )
Sub-Category
( 944 )
Judicial Branch
CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I
Decision Date
11-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MURTI NARENDER SHURA
Respondent(s)
-
1.BALJIT SINGH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-May-2026
Mr. Justice G.C. Garg (Retd.)View PDF
The Lok Adalat Bench No. 4 disposed of the appeal by awarding Rs. 8,50,000 (in addition to the tribunal's previous award) to appellants Murti and others in full settlement of their insurance claim against Baljit Singh. The insurance company was directed to deposit the cheque by 10.07.2026, with 9% interest accruing if payment was delayed, and appellant Murti undertook to indemnify any future claimants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Dec-2015
Lok Adalat Bench - 1
-
14-Dec-2015
—
Mrs. Justice Sneh Prashar
-
30-Nov-2015
Lok Adalat Bench - 1
-
30-Nov-2015
—
Mrs. Justice Sneh Prashar
-
16-Nov-2015
Lok Adalat Bench - 1
-
16-Nov-2015
—
Mrs. Justice Sneh Prashar
-
19-Oct-2015
Lok Adalat Bench - 1
-
19-Oct-2015
—
Mrs. Justice Sneh Prashar
-
28-Sep-2015
Lok Adalat Bench - 1
-
28-Sep-2015
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-May-2003
Case filed
Registration No. FAO/2085/2003
The Lok Adalat Bench No. 4 disposed of the appeal by awarding Rs. 8,50,000 (in addition to the tribunal's previous award) to appellants Murti and others in full settlement of their insurance claim against Baljit Singh. The insurance company was directed to deposit the cheque by 10.07.2026, with 9% interest accruing if payment was delayed, and appellant Murti undertook to indemnify any future claimants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts