MOTI SINGH AND ORS vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS — CWP/6848/1999

Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 13th May 2026.

CNR: PHHC010305511999

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

08th January 2014

Filing Number

CWP/6848/1999

Filing Date

05-05-5500

Registration No

CWP/6848/1999

Registration Date

05-05-5500

Judge

MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN , JUSTICE (TO BE NOMINATED)

Coram

MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN , JUSTICE (TO BE NOMINATED)

Bench Type

Double

Category

18.12 - LAND LAWS D.B. ( 449 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

13th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined

Petitioner(s)

MOTI SINGH AND ORS

Adv. ASHISH AGGARWAL

Respondent(s)

STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS

Hearing History

Judge: MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN , JUSTICE (TO BE NOMINATED)

08-01-2014
02-07-2018
07-05-2018
08-01-2018
11-07-2017

Orders

13-05-2026
MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN,JUSTICE (TO BE NOMINATED)

Case Summary: CWP/6848/1999 Decision (13.05.2026): The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Moti Singh's writ petition as infructuous because the Gram Panchayat had already taken possession of the disputed land on 17.01.1999 and subsequently leased it on 23.02.1999—both predating the petition filing. The petitioners' counsel failed to respond to the respondent's amended written statement and provided no substantive instructions, rendering the challenge moot. Liberty to revive was granted if any issue survives. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP/6848/1999 Decision (13.05.2026): The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Moti Singh's writ petition as infructuous because the Gram Panchayat had already taken possession of the disputed land on 17.01.1999 and subsequently leased it on 23.02.1999—both predating the petition filing. The petitioners' counsel failed to respond to the respondent's amended written statement and provided no substantive instructions, rendering the challenge moot. Liberty to revive was granted if any issue survives. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

No Acts Defined All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case