ROBIN vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/10666/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 10-Mar-2026

CNR: PHHC010304712026

Filing Number

CRM-M/11869/2026

Filing Date

19-Feb-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/10666/2026

Registration Date

20-Feb-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Sumeet Goel

Coram

Mr. Justice Sumeet Goel

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.2 - REGULAR BAIL (HARYANA) ( 219 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ROBIN

    Adv. Manoj Kumar Taya

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Sumeet GoelView PDF

    Case Summary: Robin v. State of Haryana (CRM-M/10666/2026) The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to petitioner Robin, who had been in custody for 2 years 8 months 11 days on charges including attempted murder, extortion, and criminal intimidation. The court found that while allegations were serious, the petitioner's extended incarceration, slow trial pace (only 25 of 44 prosecution witnesses examined), and key witness turning hostile constituted substantial change in circumstances warranting bail despite this being a second petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/10666/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Robin v. State of Haryana (CRM-M/10666/2026) The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to petitioner Robin, who had been in custody for 2 years 8 months 11 days on charges including attempted murder, extortion, and criminal intimidation. The court found that while allegations were serious, the petitioner's extended incarceration, slow trial pace (only 25 of 44 prosecution witnesses examined), and key witness turning hostile constituted substantial change in circumstances warranting bail despite this being a second petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case