JASVIR KAUR vs GHANSHAM DASS AND ANR — CRR/718/2020

Case under No Acts Defined Section 1. Disposed: --ALLOWED on 11th May 2026.

CNR: PHHC010300712020

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

CRR/15984/2020

Filing Date

03-03-2020

Registration No

CRR/718/2020

Registration Date

04-03-2020

Judge

MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ

Coram

MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ

Bench Type

Single

Category

37.41 - CRR AGNST CONV ORDER U/S 138 OF NI ACT ( 621 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

11th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined Section 1

Petitioner(s)

JASVIR KAUR

Adv. GURTEJ SINGH BENIPAL

Respondent(s)

GHANSHAM DASS AND ANR

Orders

11-05-2026
MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ

Case Summary: CRR/718/2020 - Jasvir Kaur v. Ghansham Dass The High Court of Punjab & Haryana set aside Jasvir Kaur's conviction and 2-year rigorous imprisonment sentence for cheque dishonour under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act after the parties reached a settlement agreement for Rs. 4 lakh, which was paid in full. Invoking Section 147 of the NI Act—which makes all offences under the Act compoundable—the court allowed compounding at the revision stage, holding that courts should be liberal in exercising such powers when parties voluntarily compromise, as cheque dishonour offences are fundamentally civil wrongs rather than purely criminal matters. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRR/718/2020 - Jasvir Kaur v. Ghansham Dass The High Court of Punjab & Haryana set aside Jasvir Kaur's conviction and 2-year rigorous imprisonment sentence for cheque dishonour under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act after the parties reached a settlement agreement for Rs. 4 lakh, which was paid in full. Invoking Section 147 of the NI Act—which makes all offences under the Act compoundable—the court allowed compounding at the revision stage, holding that courts should be liberal in exercising such powers when parties voluntarily compromise, as cheque dishonour offences are fundamentally civil wrongs rather than purely criminal matters. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case