NEELU SHARMA @ NEELAM AND ORS. vs ARVIND SHARMA AND ORS. — FAO/86/2002

Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 15-Oct-2008

CNR: PHHC010299322002

Filing Number

FAO/86/2002

Filing Date

05-May-2002

Registration No

FAO/86/2002

Registration Date

05-May-5500

Judge

Mr. Justice Virinder Aggarwal

Coram

Mr. Justice Virinder Aggarwal

Bench Type

Single

Category

500.21 - APPL FILED BY CLAIMANT FOR ENHANCE IN GEN CASES ( 886 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

12-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NEELU SHARMA @ NEELAM AND ORS.

    Adv. ROBIN DUTT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ARVIND SHARMA AND ORS.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Virinder AggarwalView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana enhanced the motor accident compensation from ₹2,79,600 to ₹5,23,142 for the death of Tarun Kumar, upholding the 80-20% negligence apportionment but correcting the Tribunal's calculation errors. The court added 40% future prospects to income, applied the correct multiplier of 18 (instead of 17) for the deceased's age, and standardized conventional head amounts per Supreme Court precedents, with interest revised to 7% per annum. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Nov-2008

    —

    Mr. Justice Amit Rawal

  4. 15-Oct-2008

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 05-May-2002

    Case filed

    Registration No. FAO/86/2002

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana enhanced the motor accident compensation from ₹2,79,600 to ₹5,23,142 for the death of Tarun Kumar, upholding the 80-20% negligence apportionment but correcting the Tribunal's calculation errors. The court added 40% future prospects to income, applied the correct multiplier of 18 (instead of 17) for the deceased's age, and standardized conventional head amounts per Supreme Court precedents, with interest revised to 7% per annum. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case