CHARAN SINGH @ KALA PUNIA AND ANOTHER vs NARESH JAIN — RSA/1197/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 100. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010296902023

Filing Number

RSA/11727/2023

Filing Date

03-Mar-2023

Registration No

RSA/1197/2023

Registration Date

28-Apr-2023

Judge

Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta

Coram

Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

CIVIL II(RSA) BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 100

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHARAN SINGH @ KALA PUNIA AND ANOTHER

    Adv. RAVI MALIK

  2. 2.AMIT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NARESH JAIN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Deepak GuptaView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the appellants' second appeal and affirmed the concurrent findings of both lower courts that the appellants received ₹5,00,000 as a friendly loan through a self-cheque on 10.12.2013 and failed to repay it. The court rejected the appellants' contentions that the cheque was invalid, the plaintiff lacked a money-lending licence, and insufficient documentary evidence existed, noting that the defendant's own admission of receipt during cross-examination shifted the burden of proof, which they failed to discharge with any credible evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 03-Mar-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. RSA/1197/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the appellants' second appeal and affirmed the concurrent findings of both lower courts that the appellants received ₹5,00,000 as a friendly loan through a self-cheque on 10.12.2013 and failed to repay it. The court rejected the appellants' contentions that the cheque was invalid, the plaintiff lacked a money-lending licence, and insufficient documentary evidence existed, noting that the defendant's own admission of receipt during cross-examination shifted the burden of proof, which they failed to discharge with any credible evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case