HARYANA ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT vs DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED VIDYUT SADAN HISAR AND OTHERS — ARB/83/2026

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 27-Mar-2026

CNR: PHHC010293562026

e-Filing Number

17-02-2026

Filing Number

ARB/9104/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

ARB/83/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Judge

The Chief Justice

Coram

The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single

Category

69.3 - ARBITRATION U/S 11 (5 CRORE AND ABOVE) ( 937 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HARYANA ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT

    Adv. DIXIT GARG

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED VIDYUT SADAN HISAR AND OTHERS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: ARB-83-2026 (O&M) Decision (15.05.2026): The High Court of Punjab and Haryana appointed Mr. Justice Amol Rattan Singh as Sole Arbitrator to resolve the dispute between Haryana Electrical Equipment and Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited. The court found that all prerequisites for invoking Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 were satisfied, including existence of a valid arbitration agreement (Clause 22) and exhaustion of settlement remedies by the petitioner. Key Reasoning: The respondent could not dispute the existence of the arbitration agreement, arbitrability of the dispute, or that remedies were exhausted. Applying settled legal principles requiring only "limited prima facie examination" at this stage and the rule "when in doubt, do refer," the court rejected respondent objections and appointed the arbitrator with liberty to determine jurisdiction and rule on any challenges to the arbitration agreement's validity under Section 16 of the 1996 Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. ARB/83/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: ARB-83-2026 (O&M) Decision (15.05.2026): The High Court of Punjab and Haryana appointed Mr. Justice Amol Rattan Singh as Sole Arbitrator to resolve the dispute between Haryana Electrical Equipment and Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited. The court found that all prerequisites for invoking Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 were satisfied, including existence of a valid arbitration agreement (Clause 22) and exhaustion of settlement remedies by the petitioner. Key Reasoning: The respondent could not dispute the existence of the arbitration agreement, arbitrability of the dispute, or that remedies were exhausted. Applying settled legal principles requiring only "limited prima facie examination" at this stage and the rule "when in doubt, do refer," the court rejected respondent objections and appointed the arbitrator with liberty to determine jurisdiction and rule on any challenges to the arbitration agreement's validity under Section 16 of the 1996 Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case