PRINCE KUMAR vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/10249/2026
Disposed: --ALLOWED on 21st April 2026.
CNR: PHHC010289792026
Next Hearing
09th April 2026
Filing Number
CRM-M/11171/2026
Filing Date
17-02-2026
Registration No
CRM-M/10249/2026
Registration Date
19-02-2026
Judge
MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA
Coram
MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA
Bench Type
Single
Category
99 ( 945 )
Sub-Category
40.1 - REGULAR BAIL (PUNJAB) ( 220 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL BRANCH
Decision Date
21st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
--ALLOWED
Petitioner(s)
PRINCE KUMAR
Adv. KULWINDER SINGH
Respondent(s)
STATE OF PUNJAB
Orders
Case Summary: CRM-M-10249/2026 The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted regular bail to Prince Kumar, who was arrested for NDPS Act violations (Sections 21(a), 21(b), 27(A)) after 20.71 grams of heroin and Rs. 6,50,000 were allegedly recovered from him. Justice Manisha Batra allowed the petition, reasoning that the recovered quantity does not constitute commercial quantity, investigation was complete with no prosecution witnesses examined yet (trial would take considerable time), and the petitioner had clean antecedents—making continued custody unjustifiable. Bail was conditional on furnishing personal/surety bonds; prosecution retains the right to seek bail cancellation if petitioner is involved in subsequent cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CRM-M-10249/2026 The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted regular bail to Prince Kumar, who was arrested for NDPS Act violations (Sections 21(a), 21(b), 27(A)) after 20.71 grams of heroin and Rs. 6,50,000 were allegedly recovered from him. Justice Manisha Batra allowed the petition, reasoning that the recovered quantity does not constitute commercial quantity, investigation was complete with no prosecution witnesses examined yet (trial would take considerable time), and the petitioner had clean antecedents—making continued custody unjustifiable. Bail was conditional on furnishing personal/surety bonds; prosecution retains the right to seek bail cancellation if petitioner is involved in subsequent cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts