NEPHRO CARE HEALTH SERVICES LIMITED vs DR LAL JI KIDNEY CARE CENTRE LLP AND ORS. — ARB/100/2026
Disposed: --ALLOWED on 15th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010289402026
e-Filing Number
17-02-2026
Filing Number
ARB/8915/2026
Filing Date
17-Feb-2026
Registration No
ARB/100/2026
Registration Date
24-Feb-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Jasgurpreet Singh Puri
Coram
Mr. Justice Jasgurpreet Singh Puri
Bench Type
Single
Category
69.4 - ARBITRATION U/S 11 (LESS THAN 5 CRORE) ( 938 )
Sub-Category
( 944 )
Judicial Branch
CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I
Decision Date
15-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--ALLOWED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NEPHRO CARE HEALTH SERVICES LIMITED
Adv. MOHIT SADANA
Respondent(s)
-
1.DR LAL JI KIDNEY CARE CENTRE LLP AND ORS.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-May-2026
Mr. Justice Jasgurpreet Singh PuriView PDF
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed Nephro Care Health Services Limited's petition and appointed Hon'ble Justice Gurvinder Singh Gill (Retd.) as the sole arbitrator to adjudicate the dispute between the parties. The court found that both conditions for arbitrator appointment were satisfied: a valid arbitration agreement existed between the parties (Healthcare Dialysis Services Agreement dated 17.01.2025 containing Clause 20), and the arbitration clause was properly invoked under Section 21 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, with the respondent's agreement not being disputed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. ARB/100/2026
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed Nephro Care Health Services Limited's petition and appointed Hon'ble Justice Gurvinder Singh Gill (Retd.) as the sole arbitrator to adjudicate the dispute between the parties. The court found that both conditions for arbitrator appointment were satisfied: a valid arbitration agreement existed between the parties (Healthcare Dialysis Services Agreement dated 17.01.2025 containing Clause 20), and the arbitration clause was properly invoked under Section 21 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, with the respondent's agreement not being disputed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts