AJAIB SINGH vs BHUPINDER SINGH — RSA/132/1994
Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010289331994
Filing Number
RSA/132/1994
Filing Date
18-Sep-2008
Registration No
RSA/132/1994
Registration Date
18-Sep-2008
Judge
Mr. Justice Pankaj Jain
Coram
Mr. Justice Pankaj Jain
Bench Type
Single
Category
26 - RSA ( 496 )
Sub-Category
( 944 )
Judicial Branch
CIVIL II(RSA) BRANCH
Decision Date
13-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AJAIB SINGH
Adv. ALKA SARIN
Respondent(s)
-
1.BHUPINDER SINGH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-May-2026
Mr. Justice Pankaj JainView PDF
CASE SUMMARY: RSA/132/1994 - Ajaib Singh v. Bhupinder Singh The Punjab and Haryana High Court allowed the plaintiffs' appeal, holding both contested wills invalid due to suspicious circumstances. The plaintiffs (as collateral heirs of deceased Ralla Singh) failed to prove a 1975 will allegedly executed in their favor; the defendant's 1972 registered will was also rejected because the propounder failed to dispel critical suspicious circumstances—including prior litigation where Ralla Singh alleged pressure to execute wills, an interested attesting witness with financial stake, and incorrectly described beneficiary relationships. The court held that mere registration cannot overcome suspicious circumstances without satisfactory explanation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Sep-2008
Case filed
Registration No. RSA/132/1994
CASE SUMMARY: RSA/132/1994 - Ajaib Singh v. Bhupinder Singh The Punjab and Haryana High Court allowed the plaintiffs' appeal, holding both contested wills invalid due to suspicious circumstances. The plaintiffs (as collateral heirs of deceased Ralla Singh) failed to prove a 1975 will allegedly executed in their favor; the defendant's 1972 registered will was also rejected because the propounder failed to dispel critical suspicious circumstances—including prior litigation where Ralla Singh alleged pressure to execute wills, an interested attesting witness with financial stake, and incorrectly described beneficiary relationships. The court held that mere registration cannot overcome suspicious circumstances without satisfactory explanation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts