N.K. MAIR AND ANR. RAJESH LAMBA vs STATE OF HARYANA & ANR — CRM-M/9927/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 24-Mar-2026

CNR: PHHC010278482026

Filing Number

CRM-M/10612/2026

Filing Date

16-Feb-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/9927/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Sumeet Goel

Coram

Mr. Justice Sumeet Goel

Bench Type

Single

Category

38.21 - QUASHING PETITION COMPROMISE U/S 482 CRPC GEN ( 641 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.N.K. MAIR AND ANR. RAJESH LAMBA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA & ANR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Sumeet GoelView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M-9927/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana quashed FIR No. 200 (dated 10.06.2021) against petitioners N.K. Mair and Rajesh Lamba for offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC, based on a valid compromise between all parties dated 11.02.2026. The Court found the alleged offences were primarily private in nature, the compromise was voluntary and genuine, and all affected parties—including complainant Dinesh Kumar—had entered into settlement without coercion, thus satisfying conditions for exercise of jurisdiction under Section 528 BNSS, 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/9927/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M-9927/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana quashed FIR No. 200 (dated 10.06.2021) against petitioners N.K. Mair and Rajesh Lamba for offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC, based on a valid compromise between all parties dated 11.02.2026. The Court found the alleged offences were primarily private in nature, the compromise was voluntary and genuine, and all affected parties—including complainant Dinesh Kumar—had entered into settlement without coercion, thus satisfying conditions for exercise of jurisdiction under Section 528 BNSS, 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case