BALA NOW DECEASED THR LRS vs SANDEEP AND ORS — FAO/1201/2024

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010271142024

Filing Number

FAO/10769/2024

Filing Date

26-Feb-2024

Registration No

FAO/1201/2024

Registration Date

13-Mar-2024

Judge

Ms. Justice Nidhi Gupta

Coram

Ms. Justice Nidhi Gupta

Bench Type

Single

Category

500.31 - APPL FILED BY CLAIMANT FOR ENHANCE IN GEN CASES ( 896 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BALA NOW DECEASED THR LRS

    Adv. BALKAR SINGH

  2. 2.SANDEEP

  3. 3.RAMPHAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SANDEEP AND ORS

  2. 2.SANDEEP

  3. 3.RAMPHAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Ms. Justice Nidhi GuptaView PDF

    Case Summary: FAO/1201/2024 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the appellant's appeal seeking enhancement of motor accident compensation from Rs.50,000 to Rs.50 lakh. The court upheld the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's finding that while the death of Gulab Singh in a 2018 vehicular accident was proven, the appellant failed to establish rash and negligent driving by respondent No.1, as the key eyewitness was never examined before the tribunal and the FIR lacked material details. The Rs.50,000 awarded under "No Fault Liability" was affirmed as appropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Feb-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. FAO/1201/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: FAO/1201/2024 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the appellant's appeal seeking enhancement of motor accident compensation from Rs.50,000 to Rs.50 lakh. The court upheld the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's finding that while the death of Gulab Singh in a 2018 vehicular accident was proven, the appellant failed to establish rash and negligent driving by respondent No.1, as the key eyewitness was never examined before the tribunal and the FIR lacked material details. The Rs.50,000 awarded under "No Fault Liability" was affirmed as appropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case