CHHOTI MAHANT @ CHOTI vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/9049/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 11-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010267402026

Filing Number

CRM-M/10017/2026

Filing Date

13-Feb-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/9049/2026

Registration Date

13-Feb-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth

Coram

Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

39 - ANTICIPATORY BAILS ( 144 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHHOTI MAHANT @ CHOTI

    Adv. Naveen Bawa

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Sanjay VashisthView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M/9049/2026 Chhoti Mahant @ Choti sought anticipatory bail in a criminal case involving charges under BNS 2023 (Sections 115(2), 118(1), 351(2), 190, 191(3)) arising from a dispute over "badhai" collection within the transgender community that resulted in a scuffle with simple injuries. The High Court of Punjab and Haryana made the ad-interim bail order absolute, granting full anticipatory bail since the petitioner had cooperated with investigation and custodial interrogation was no longer required, subject to passport submission/affidavit within one week and continued cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/9049/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M/9049/2026 Chhoti Mahant @ Choti sought anticipatory bail in a criminal case involving charges under BNS 2023 (Sections 115(2), 118(1), 351(2), 190, 191(3)) arising from a dispute over "badhai" collection within the transgender community that resulted in a scuffle with simple injuries. The High Court of Punjab and Haryana made the ad-interim bail order absolute, granting full anticipatory bail since the petitioner had cooperated with investigation and custodial interrogation was no longer required, subject to passport submission/affidavit within one week and continued cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case