NARESH DATTA vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS Advocate - A.G. PUNJAB — CWP/4708/2024
Case under Constitution of India Section 1. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 13th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010267262024
Filing Number
CWP/10627/2024
Filing Date
26-Feb-2024
Registration No
CWP/4708/2024
Registration Date
27-Feb-2024
Judge
Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh Brar
Coram
Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh Brar
Bench Type
Single
Category
20.5 - SC OSB (PUNJAB) RETIRAL BENEFITS ( 467 )
Sub-Category
( 944 )
Judicial Branch
WRITS -I BRANCH
Decision Date
13-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NARESH DATTA
Adv. ANKIT MIDHA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS Advocate - A.G. PUNJAB
-
2.PUNJAB WATER RESOURCES MGYT. AND DEV. CORPORATION LTD. ,L
-
3.BOARD OF DIRECTORS, PWRMDCL,
-
4.DIVISIONAL ENGINEER, LINING DIVISION NO. 5, PRMDCL,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-May-2026
Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh BrarView PDF
Case Summary: CWP/4708/2024 - Naresh Datta v. State of Punjab The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed the petition of a retired employee seeking enhanced gratuity and 6th Pay Commission benefits. The court directed the Punjab Water Resources Management and Development Corporation to pay the balance arrears of enhanced gratuity within two weeks at 6% interest, and disposed of claims for revised pay benefits in line with established precedent (Nirmal Singh Dhanoa judgment). The petitioner was permitted to file a separate representation regarding EPF employer contributions within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-Feb-2024
Other
-
26-Feb-2024
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/4708/2024
Case Summary: CWP/4708/2024 - Naresh Datta v. State of Punjab The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed the petition of a retired employee seeking enhanced gratuity and 6th Pay Commission benefits. The court directed the Punjab Water Resources Management and Development Corporation to pay the balance arrears of enhanced gratuity within two weeks at 6% interest, and disposed of claims for revised pay benefits in line with established precedent (Nirmal Singh Dhanoa judgment). The petitioner was permitted to file a separate representation regarding EPF employer contributions within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts